The FIRST Adobe Stock Photo Experiment


With the release of Adobe Stock, the tech and creative mega-company is making some big claims.  Notably, they are arguing that Adobe Stock Photography is doing something entirely new, and offering a revolutionary approach to stock photography never before seen.  Adobe’s total app integration is a very interesting feature, but is it truly unprecedented?  While digging through old press releases and researching the development of Adobe Stock Photos, we found some evidence from Adobe themselves that would suggest otherwise.

The FIRST Adobe Stock Photo Experiment

“Adobe’s unique approach brings royalty-free image libraries into the heart of the creative process, with tight integration in the products creative professionals rely on,” the press release reads.  All sounds familiar: we’ve heard this kind of language about Adobe Stock since the beginning.  But as you keep reading, it gets obvious quickly that something odd is going on.  The press release mentions full integration with CS2, a now very dated software package.  Oh, and if you look to the top of the release, you will notice the date of the big announcement: April 4, 2005.  What exactly is going on here?

adobe stock photo experiment

As it turns out, Adobe developed a very similar product to their current Adobe Stock Photo offerings a full decade ago, with similiar selling points and similar claims of revolutionary features.  The original Adobe Stock Photo experiment was a much smaller product release and differed in some significant ways, most notably offering images through other vendors rather than maintaining a stand-alone independent stock photo library.  But the big selling points, like app integration which offers “streamlined approach to image management,” all look and sound exactly like the latest iteration of Adobe Stock.  So what should we make of Adobe’s original foray into stock photography?

Stock Photo Customers Want Quality Images


First, we could obviously note that Adobe’s claims to be doing something entirely revolutionary with their current Adobe Stock product release seem to be somewhat misleading: Adobe themselves offered a similar product a decade ago!  More importantly though, there is a lesson to be learned from the original Adobe Stock Photo experiment.  And that lesson is that stock photo users want high quality imagery and consistency from their stock photo vendors.  All of the cutting edge features in the world won’t keep customers loyal if the core product isn’t there.

This time, Adobe is taking a new approach by offering their own stand alone, professionally curated library, and we’re guessing that will help make this Adobe Stock experiment more successful.  But only time will tell whether or not this latest jump into the world of stock photography will last, or whether we will be seeing new press releases from Adobe touting “revolutionary” products in another decade or so.

Free Photos versus Cheap Stock Photos

There are two types of images available in the internet – free photos and cheap stock photos. While they both perform the same functions, each of them has their own advantages and disadvantages. You can use either of them for your creative needs, but you need to recognize the certain risks that they entail. Now, let’s see why you should choose one above the other.

Free Photos

Free photos

As the name suggests, free photos do not require you to get your money out. It sounds tempting, right? Who does not like free things? Nothing sounds as exciting as free photos. You can find them in search engines, where you can simply search and download. Search engines offer free photos that are labeled for reuse commercially. Some even allow modifications to fit your theme. But, are all these worth it?

Free photos, while free, entails certain legal risks. These photos do not protect you from copyright laws both locally and internationally. You may be facing some legal risks if you use these photos as they do not include specific terms and conditions that give you information about how many times you can use the image, where you can use it and how you use it. Keep in mind that just because they are labeled free does not mean you can use them whenever, wherever and however you want.

Cheap Stock Photos

Cheap Photos

Unlike free photos, these images are not free. But, they are cheap. They are offered in many stock photo sites in as low prices as possible. They are available for single purchases and subscription plans. If you only need one image, pay as you or pay as you download will get you the image you want. If you require more images, a subscription plan is the best choice. It will not only give you many images but cheaper prices as well.

For a cheap price, these stock images protect you from legal consequences. Why is this important? For the very cheap price of stock photos from trusted stock photo sites, you will be able to avoid costly fines from copyright issues. For the price of $1, for instance, you can dodge thousands of dollars’ worth of fines. These images include terms and conditions that inform you about the proper use of image to avoid hefty penalties.

With these advantages and disadvantages, you should be able to choose the best. Are you using free photos from search engines? If you are, you should stop being a cheapskate. Set aside money to get cheap stock photos to save yourself from a bigger spending in the future. Remember, copyright disputes are very heavy. From your desire to save a dollar, you can lose thousands.